We alternate Writers and artists at our monthly meetings. This time, my work, Uncle Uriel's Legacy was one of the works being critted. As well as the usual: does it make sense? could you follow the story? would you want to read more? - questions, I had two specific ones:
- I started out thinking I was writing a book for teenagers/ young adults, but now I'm not sure. Is the writing, especially in the Book of Daniel, too demanding? Should I be aiming at adults?
- The story is told in two voices: Just Soh's Story - a third person narrative told from the point of view of Soh (Sophrosnia Ecklethwight) - and the Book of Daniel, narrated in the first person by Daniel. I wanted to consider whether these narratives should alternate chronologically: 11/11/18 Soh, 11/11/18 Daniel, 25/11/18 Soh and so on... Or should I tell Soh's complete story, then Daniel's, then the third part where they meet?
The SSWAGgers were extremely complimentary about the writing. I do wonder sometimes whether we are too kind. The consensus seemed to be that the target age wasn't a problem. It could appeal to both adults and literate teenagers. It's not for the spoon-fed, but does that matter?
On the question of how to deliver the two narratives, I'm inclining toward the alternating version, though I will probably write it one story then another. In fact, it's actually the case that I'm writing it higgledy-piggledy. I have written much of the third, joint, part and bits from all over of the other two, but from the planning point of view, I'm going section 1 -10 Soh, section 11 - 20 Daniel, 21- 30 joint. This probably makes no sense to anyone but me. You'll see.
No comments:
Post a Comment